Re: SQL/JSON functions vs. ECPG vs. STRING as a reserved word

On 2022-05-29 Su 16:19, Tom Lane wrote:
> More generally, I feel like we have a process problem: there needs to
> be a higher bar to adding new fully- or even partially-reserved words.
> I might've missed it, but I don't recall that there was any discussion
> of the compatibility implications of this change.
>

Thanks for fixing this while I was away.

I did in fact raise the issue on 1 Feb, see
<https://postgr.es/m/f174a289-3274-569d-875c-2e810101df22@dunslane.net>,
but nobody responded that I recall. I guess I should have pushed the
discussion further


cheers


andrew


--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com