Re: master make check fails on Solaris 10

Marina Polyakova <m.polyakova@postgrespro.ru>

From: Marina Polyakova <m.polyakova@postgrespro.ru>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: vitus@wagner.pp.ru, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Date: 2018-01-18T14:43:07Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 17-01-2018 18:50, Marina Polyakova wrote:
> On 17-01-2018 18:28, Tom Lane wrote:
>> BTW, now that you've demonstrated that the bug exists in a current
>> gcc release, you should definitely file a bug at
>> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
>> I think you can just give them int128test2.c as-is as a test case.
>> 
>> Please do that and let me know the PR number --- I think it would be
>> good to cite the bug specifically in the comments for our configure 
>> code.
> 
> Thanks, I'll try to do it.

If I understand correctly, its PR number is 83925 (see [1]).

[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83925

-- 
Marina Polyakova
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company


Commits

  1. Extend configure's __int128 test to check for a known gcc bug.

  2. Reorder C includes

  3. Ability to advance replication slots

  4. doc: add JSON acronym

  5. Expression evaluation based aggregate transition invocation.

  6. Change some bogus PageGetLSN calls to BufferGetLSNAtomic

  7. Prevent int128 from requiring more than MAXALIGN alignment.

  8. Rearrange c.h to create a "compiler characteristics" section.

  9. Make OWNER TO subcommand mention consistent