Re: Return value of pg_promote()
Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>
From: Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>
To: Ashutosh Sharma <ashu.coek88@gmail.com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2023-06-06T17:00:57Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, 2023-06-06 at 16:35 +0530, Ashutosh Sharma wrote: > At present, pg_promote() returns true to the caller on successful > promotion of standby, however it returns false in multiple scenarios > which includes: > > 1) The SIGUSR1 signal could not be sent to the postmaster process. > 2) The postmaster died during standby promotion. > 3) Standby couldn't be promoted within the specified wait time. > > For an application calling this function, if pg_promote returns false, > it is hard to interpret the reason behind it. So I think we should > *only* allow pg_promote to return false when the server could not be > promoted in the given wait time and in other scenarios it should just > throw an error (FATAL, ERROR ... depending on the type of failure that > occurred). Please let me know your thoughts on this change. thanks.! As the original author, I'd say that that sounds reasonable, particularly in case #1. If the postmaster dies, we are going to die too, so it probably doesn't matter much. But I think an error is certainly also correct in that case. Yours, Laurenz Albe
Commits
-
Tweak pg_promote() to report failures on kill() or postmaster failures
- f593c5517d14 17.0 landed