Re: Corrupted btree index on HEAD because of covering indexes

Teodor Sigaev <teodor@sigaev.ru>

From: Teodor Sigaev <teodor@sigaev.ru>

To: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>

Cc: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Anastasia Lubennikova <a.lubennikova@postgrespro.ru>

Date: 2018-04-19T19:47:02Z

Lists: pgsql-hackers

Attachments

vacuum_nbtree-v2.patch (text/x-patch) patch v2

> I also think that we could have better conventional regression test
> coverage here.

I tried to minimize Michael's test case and add it to patch.

-- 
Teodor Sigaev                      E-mail: teodor@sigaev.ru
                                       WWW: http://www.sigaev.ru/

Commits

Add missing and dangling downlink checks to amcheck
- 4eaf7eaccb29 11.0 landed
Fix wrong validation of top-parent pointer during page deletion in Btree.
- 6db4b49986be 11.0 landed
Add integrity-checking functions to pg_visibility.
- e472ce9624e0 9.6.0 cited
Make the handling of interrupted B-tree page splits more robust.
- 40dae7ec537c 9.4.0 cited