Re: Stack-based tracking of per-node WAL/buffer usage

Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>

From: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>
To: Lukas Fittl <lukas@fittl.com>, Zsolt Parragi <zsolt.parragi@percona.com>
Cc: Tomas Vondra <tomas@vondra.me>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>
Date: 2026-03-23T14:41:18Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 19/03/2026 02:45, Lukas Fittl wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 18, 2026 at 4:36 PM Lukas Fittl <lukas@fittl.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 18, 2026 at 1:49 PM Zsolt Parragi <zsolt.parragi@percona.com> wrote:
>>> There seems to be one more bug in this:
>>>
>>> 1. EXPLAIN ANALYZE fires a trigger
>>> 2. The trigger function throws ERROR, InstrStopTrigger never runs
>>> 3. ResOwnerReleaseInstrumentation runs but only checks
>>> unfinalized_children, not triggers
>>> 4. InstrStopFinalize discards the trigger entry
>>> 5. Trigger instrumentation information shows 0
>>
>> Hmm, so I think you're correct that a trigger function error would
>> cause any stack-based instrumentation from the trigger to get lost.
>>
>> In practice that doesn't matter today, since triggers never capture
>> WAL/buffer usage data (only timing),
> 
> After twisting and turning this in my head more, I realize that's
> actually not correct - as it stands, trigger instrumentation is
> inheriting the instrumentation options from the overall query, and so
> that will cause a typical EXPLAIN (ANALYZE) to also capture Buffer/WAL
> usage for triggers - it just won't be shown in EXPLAIN.
> 
> Since its not used in practice, we could fix that by explicitly
> setting INSTRUMENT_TIMER for triggers, but AFAIR Andres had noted on a
> prior iteration that special casing this doesn't seem right, since we
> should probably output buffer/WAL usage for triggers anyway.
> 
> So I guess that brings us back to, we should fix it with one of the
> ways I mentioned. FWIW, I was able to create a test case in the
> pg_session_buffer_usage module to that effect, so there is indeed a
> current issue where activity during triggers gets lost and won't be
> added to the overall totals on abort.

I'm looking at this finalize at resowner part of this patch, and this 
maybe a stupid question, but:

Why does the instrumentation need to be "finalized" on abort? If you run 
EXPLAIN ANALYZE and the query aborts, you don't get to see the stats anyway.

- Heikki




Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →
  1. instrumentation: Allocate query level instrumentation in ExecutorStart

  2. instrumentation: Move ExecProcNodeInstr to allow inlining

  3. instrumentation: Separate per-node logic from other uses

  4. instrumentation: Separate trigger logic from other uses

  5. instrumentation: Rename INSTR_TIME_LT macro to INSTR_TIME_GT

  6. instrumentation: Keep time fields as instrtime, convert in callers