Horton

Re: pg_statistic_ext.staenabled might not be the best column name

Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Date: 2017-04-13T16:00:12Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On 4/13/17 08:37, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>> We could go with "ste" perhaps, or break the convention of 3-character
>> prefixes and go with "stae".
> We have a bunch of > 3-character prefixes already: amop*, amproc*, 
> enum*, cast*. But I think I nevertheless like "ste" better.

"stx" perhaps?

I would also be in favor of changing it to something other than "sta".

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

Commits

  1. Rename columns in new pg_statistic_ext catalog