Re: Prevent printing "next step instructions" in initdb and pg_upgrade

Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2020-10-27T11:35:56Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 2020-10-27 11:53, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 11:35:25AM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> On 2020-10-06 12:26, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>>> I went with the name --no-instructions to have the same name for both
>>> initdb and pg_upgrade. The downside is that "no-instructions" also
>>> causes the scripts not to be written in pg_upgrade, which arguably is a
>>> different thing. We could go with "--no-instructions" and
>>> "--no-scripts", but that would leave the parameters different. I also
>>> considered "--no-next-step", but that one didn't quite have the right
>>> ring to me. I'm happy for other suggestions on the parameter names.
>>
>> What scripts are left after we remove the analyze script, as discussed in a
>> different thread?
> 
> There is still delete_old_cluster.sh.

Well, that one can trivially be replaced by a printed instruction, too.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



Commits

  1. Remove extra Success message at the end of initdb