Re: Prevent printing "next step instructions" in initdb and pg_upgrade
Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
From: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>,
PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2020-10-27T11:35:56Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 2020-10-27 11:53, Bruce Momjian wrote: > On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 11:35:25AM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote: >> On 2020-10-06 12:26, Magnus Hagander wrote: >>> I went with the name --no-instructions to have the same name for both >>> initdb and pg_upgrade. The downside is that "no-instructions" also >>> causes the scripts not to be written in pg_upgrade, which arguably is a >>> different thing. We could go with "--no-instructions" and >>> "--no-scripts", but that would leave the parameters different. I also >>> considered "--no-next-step", but that one didn't quite have the right >>> ring to me. I'm happy for other suggestions on the parameter names. >> >> What scripts are left after we remove the analyze script, as discussed in a >> different thread? > > There is still delete_old_cluster.sh. Well, that one can trivially be replaced by a printed instruction, too. -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
Commits
-
Remove extra Success message at the end of initdb
- e7f429148549 14.0 landed