Re: backup manifests and contemporaneous buildfarm failures
Petr Jelinek <petr@2ndquadrant.com>
Commits
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Try to avoid compiler warnings in optimized builds.
- 05021a2c0cd2 13.0 landed
-
Fix option related issues in pg_verifybackup.
- 0a89e93bfaa6 13.0 landed
-
Add index term for backup manifest in documentation.
- 4db819ba4039 13.0 landed
-
Code review for backup manifest.
- a2ac73e7be7a 13.0 landed
-
Document the backup manifest file format.
- 149f2ae88ab0 13.0 landed
-
Fix typo in pg_validatebackup documentation.
- c4f82a779d26 13.0 landed
-
Exclude backup_manifest file that existed in database, from BASE_BACKUP.
- 1ec50a81ec0a 13.0 landed
-
Msys2 tweaks for pg_validatebackup corruption test
- c3e4cbaab936 13.0 landed
-
Fix resource management bug with replication=database.
- 3e0d80fd8d3d 13.0 cited
-
Be more careful about time_t vs. pg_time_t in basebackup.c.
- db1531cae009 13.0 cited
-
pg_validatebackup: Fix 'make clean' to remove tmp_check.
- 9f8f881caa0f 13.0 landed
-
pg_validatebackup: Also use perl2host in TAP tests.
- 460314db08e8 13.0 landed
-
Generate backup manifests for base backups, and validate them.
- 0d8c9c1210c4 13.0 landed
-
Add checksum helper functions.
- c12e43a2e0d4 13.0 landed
-
pg_waldump: Add a --quiet option.
- ac44367efbef 13.0 landed
-
Catversion bump for b9b408c48724
- afb5465e0cfc 13.0 cited
-
pg_basebackup: Refactor code for reading COPY and tar data.
- 431ba7bebf13 13.0 landed
-
Use a ResourceOwner to track buffer pins in all cases.
- 3cb646264e8c 12.0 cited
-
Use ARMv8 CRC instructions where available.
- f044d71e331d 11.0 cited
-
Logical replication support for initial data copy
- 7c4f52409a8c 10.0 cited
-
Use Intel SSE 4.2 CRC instructions where available.
- 3dc2d62d0486 9.5.0 cited
-
Switch to CRC-32C in WAL and other places.
- 5028f22f6eb0 9.5.0 cited
-
Remove support for 64-bit CRC.
- 404bc51cde9d 9.5.0 cited
-
Change CRCs in WAL records from 64bit to 32bit for performance reasons.
- 21fda22ec46d 8.1.0 cited
On 04/04/2020 05:06, Andres Freund wrote: > Hi, > > Peter, Petr, CCed you because it's probably a bug somewhere around the > initial copy code for logical replication. > > > On 2020-04-03 20:48:09 -0400, Robert Haas wrote: >> 'serinus' is also failing. This is less obviously related: > > Hm. Tests passed once since then. > > >> 2020-04-04 02:08:57.299 CEST [5e87d019.506c1:4] LOG: received >> replication command: CREATE_REPLICATION_SLOT >> "tap_sub_16390_sync_16384" TEMPORARY LOGICAL pgoutput USE_SNAPSHOT >> 2020-04-04 02:08:57.299 CEST [5e87d019.506c1:5] ERROR: replication >> slot "tap_sub_16390_sync_16384" already exists > > That already seems suspicious. I checked the following (successful) run > and I did not see that in the stage's logs. > > Looking at the failing log, it fails because for some reason there's > rounds (once due to a refresh, once due to an intention replication > failure) of copying the relation. Each creates its own temporary slot. > > first time: > 2020-04-04 02:08:57.276 CEST [5e87d019.506bd:1] LOG: connection received: host=[local] > 2020-04-04 02:08:57.278 CEST [5e87d019.506bd:4] LOG: received replication command: CREATE_REPLICATION_SLOT "tap_sub_16390_sync_16384" TEMPORARY LOGICAL pgoutput USE_SNAPSHOT > 2020-04-04 02:08:57.282 CEST [5e87d019.506bd:9] LOG: statement: COPY public.tab_rep TO STDOUT > 2020-04-04 02:08:57.284 CEST [5e87d019.506bd:10] LOG: disconnection: session time: 0:00:00.007 user=bf database=postgres host=[local] > > second time: > 2020-04-04 02:08:57.288 CEST [5e87d019.506bf:1] LOG: connection received: host=[local] > 2020-04-04 02:08:57.289 CEST [5e87d019.506bf:4] LOG: received replication command: CREATE_REPLICATION_SLOT "tap_sub_16390_sync_16384" TEMPORARY LOGICAL pgoutput USE_SNAPSHOT > 2020-04-04 02:08:57.293 CEST [5e87d019.506bf:9] LOG: statement: COPY public.tab_rep TO STDOUT > > third time: > 2020-04-04 02:08:57.297 CEST [5e87d019.506c1:1] LOG: connection received: host=[local] > 2020-04-04 02:08:57.299 CEST [5e87d019.506c1:4] LOG: received replication command: CREATE_REPLICATION_SLOT "tap_sub_16390_sync_16384" TEMPORARY LOGICAL pgoutput USE_SNAPSHOT > 2020-04-04 02:08:57.299 CEST [5e87d019.506c1:5] ERROR: replication slot "tap_sub_16390_sync_16384" already exists > > Note that the connection from the second attempt has not yet > disconnected. Hence the error about the replication slot already > existing - it's a temporary replication slot that'd otherwise already > have been dropped. > > > Seems the logical rep code needs to do something about this race? > The downstream: > 2020-04-04 02:08:57.275 CEST [5e87d019.506bc:1] LOG: logical replication table synchronization worker for subscription "tap_sub", table "tab_rep" has started > 2020-04-04 02:08:57.282 CEST [5e87d019.506bc:2] ERROR: duplicate key value violates unique constraint "tab_rep_pkey" > 2020-04-04 02:08:57.282 CEST [5e87d019.506bc:3] DETAIL: Key (a)=(1) already exists. > 2020-04-04 02:08:57.282 CEST [5e87d019.506bc:4] CONTEXT: COPY tab_rep, line 1 > 2020-04-04 02:08:57.283 CEST [5e87d018.50689:5] LOG: background worker "logical replication worker" (PID 329404) exited with exit code 1 > 2020-04-04 02:08:57.287 CEST [5e87d019.506be:1] LOG: logical replication table synchronization worker for subscription "tap_sub", table "tab_rep" has started > 2020-04-04 02:08:57.293 CEST [5e87d019.506be:2] ERROR: duplicate key value violates unique constraint "tab_rep_pkey" > 2020-04-04 02:08:57.293 CEST [5e87d019.506be:3] DETAIL: Key (a)=(1) already exists. > 2020-04-04 02:08:57.293 CEST [5e87d019.506be:4] CONTEXT: COPY tab_rep, line 1 > 2020-04-04 02:08:57.295 CEST [5e87d018.50689:6] LOG: background worker "logical replication worker" (PID 329406) exited with exit code 1 > 2020-04-04 02:08:57.297 CEST [5e87d019.506c0:1] LOG: logical replication table synchronization worker for subscription "tap_sub", table "tab_rep" has started > 2020-04-04 02:08:57.299 CEST [5e87d019.506c0:2] ERROR: could not create replication slot "tap_sub_16390_sync_16384": ERROR: replication slot "tap_sub_16390_sync_16384" already exists > 2020-04-04 02:08:57.300 CEST [5e87d018.50689:7] LOG: background worker "logical replication worker" (PID 329408) exited with exit code Looks like we are simply retrying so fast that upstream will not have finished cleanup after second try by the time we already run the third one. The last_start_times is supposed to protect against that so I guess there is some issue with how that works. -- Petr Jelinek 2ndQuadrant - PostgreSQL Solutions for the Enterprise https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/