Horton

Re: Proposals for EXPLAIN: rename ANALYZE to EXECUTE and extend VERBOSE

Vik Fearing <vik@postgresfriends.org>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Vik Fearing <vik@postgresfriends.org>
To: David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>, Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume@lelarge.info>
Cc: Greg Sabino Mullane <htamfids@gmail.com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Michael Christofides <michael@pgmustard.com>, "David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>, Nikolay Samokhvalov <samokhvalov@gmail.com>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2024-11-20T21:54:23Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On 20/11/2024 22:22, David Rowley wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Nov 2024 at 08:30, Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume@lelarge.info> wrote:
>> OK, I'm fine with this. v4 patch attached with one plan showing read, written, and dirtied buffers.
> I think this might be a good time for anyone out there who is against
> turning on BUFFERS when ANALYZE is on to speak up.
>
> Votes for changing this so far seem to be: Me, Michael Christofides,
> Guillaume Lelarge, Robert, Greg Sabino Mullane, and David Fetter (from
> 2020) [1].


Add me to the pro list, please.

https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/b3197ba8-225f-f53c-326d-5b1756c77c3e@postgresfriends.org

-- 

Vik Fearing

Commits

  1. Fix further fallout from EXPLAIN ANALYZE BUFFERS change

  2. Add missing BUFFERS OFF in regression tests, take 2

  3. Add missing BUFFERS OFF in select_into regression tests

  4. Enable BUFFERS with EXPLAIN ANALYZE by default