Re: Vacuum statistics

Alena Rybakina <a.rybakina@postgrespro.ru>

From: Alena Rybakina <a.rybakina@postgrespro.ru>

To: Ilia Evdokimov <ilya.evdokimov@tantorlabs.com>

Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>, Jim Nasby <jnasby@upgrade.com>, Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill@gmail.com>, Andrei Zubkov <zubkov@moonset.ru>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>, Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>, jian he <jian.universality@gmail.com>, a.lepikhov@postgrespro.ru, Sami Imseih <samimseih@gmail.com>

Date: 2025-03-12T19:41:33Z

Lists: pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →

Move wal_buffers_full from PgStat_PendingWalStats to WalUsage
- eaf502747bac 18.0 cited

Hi!

On 10.03.2025 12:13, Ilia Evdokimov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> After commit eaf5027 we should add information about wal_buffers_full.
>
> Any thoughts?
>
> -- 
> Best regards,
> Ilia Evdokimov,
> Tantor Labs LLC.
>
I think I can add it. To be honest, I haven't gotten to know this 
statistic yet, haven't had time to get to know this commit yet. How will 
this statistic help us analyze the work of the vacuum for relations?

-- 
Regards,
Alena Rybakina
Postgres Professional