Re: Password identifiers, protocol aging and SCRAM protocol
Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>
From: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>
To: Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
Cc: David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>,
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, David Fetter <david@fetter.org>,
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>,
Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>,
Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>,
Julian Markwort <julian.markwort@uni-muenster.de>,
Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>,
PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>,
Valery Popov <v.popov@postgrespro.ru>
Date: 2016-10-17T08:55:21Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 10/15/2016 04:26 PM, Michael Paquier wrote: >> * Now that we don't call random() in postmaster anymore, is there any point >> in calling srandom() there (i.e. where the above incorrect comment was)? >> Should we remove it? random() might be used by pre-loaded extensions, >> though. (Hopefully not for cryptographic purposes.) > > That's the business of the maintainers such modules, so my heart is > telling me to rip it off, but my mind tells me that there is no point > in making them unhappy either if they rely on it. I'd trust my mind on > this one, other opinions are welcome. I kept it for now. Doesn't do any harm either, even if it's unnecessary. >> * Should we backport this? Sorry if we discussed that already, but I don't >> remember. > > I think that we discussed quickly the point at last PGCon during the > SCRAM-committee-unofficial meeting, and that we talked about doing > that only for HEAD. Ok, committed to HEAD. Thanks! - Heikki
Commits
-
Support SCRAM-SHA-256 authentication (RFC 5802 and 7677).
- 818fd4a67d61 10.0 landed
-
Refactor SHA2 functions and move them to src/common/.
- 273c458a2b3a 10.0 landed
-
Replace isMD5() with a more future-proof way to check if pw is encrypted.
- dbd69118c05d 10.0 landed
-
Remove bogus notice that older clients might not work with MD5 passwords.
- 7e3ae5455948 9.2.20 landed
- 470af1f41c8b 9.3.16 landed
- ada2cdb61015 9.4.11 landed
- 65a7f190b253 9.5.6 landed
- 7546c135dc30 9.6.2 landed
- 31c54096a18f 10.0 landed
-
Refactor the code for verifying user's password.
- e7f051b8f9a6 10.0 landed
-
Replace PostmasterRandom() with a stronger source, second attempt.
- fe0a0b5993df 10.0 landed
-
Remove support for (insecure) crypt authentication.
- 53a5026b5cb3 8.4.0 cited