Horton

Re: Flaky vacuum truncate test in reloptions.sql

Arseny Sher <a.sher@postgrespro.ru>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Arseny Sher <a.sher@postgrespro.ru>
To: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2021-03-31T13:39:39Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On 3/31/21 4:17 PM, Masahiko Sawada wrote:

 > Is it better to add FREEZE to the first "VACUUM reloptions_test;" as 
well?

I don't think this matters much, as it tests the contrary and the 
probability of
successful test passing (in case of theoretical bug making vacuum to 
truncate
non-empty relation) becomes stunningly small. But adding it wouldn't hurt
either.

-- cheers, arseny

Commits

  1. Improve stability of test with vacuum_truncate in reloptions.sql