Horton

Re: Stronger safeguard for archive recovery not to miss data

Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>
To: "osumi.takamichi@fujitsu.com" <osumi.takamichi@fujitsu.com>, 'Kyotaro Horiguchi' <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
Cc: "david@pgmasters.net" <david@pgmasters.net>, "pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org" <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>, "laurenz.albe@cybertec.at" <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>
Date: 2021-04-06T11:13:49Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 

On 2021/04/06 15:59, osumi.takamichi@fujitsu.com wrote:
> I just wanted to write why the error was introduced,
> but it was not necessary.
> We should remove and fix the first part of the sentence.

So the consensus is almost the same as the latest patch?
If they are not so different, I'm thinking to push the latest version at first.
Then we can improve the docs if required.

Regards,

-- 
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION

Commits

  1. Fix test added by commit 9de9294b0c.

  2. Stop archive recovery if WAL generated with wal_level=minimal is found.