Re: POC, WIP: OR-clause support for indexes
Andrei Lepikhov <a.lepikhov@postgrespro.ru>
Commits
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Make group_similar_or_args() reorder clause list as little as possible
- 775a06d44c04 18.0 landed
-
Allow usage of match_orclause_to_indexcol() for joins
- 627d63419e22 18.0 landed
-
Skip not SOAP-supported indexes while transforming an OR clause into SAOP
- 5bba0546eecb 18.0 landed
-
Remove the wrong assertion from match_orclause_to_indexcol()
- d4d11940df94 18.0 landed
-
Teach bitmap path generation about transforming OR-clauses to SAOP's
- ae4569161a27 18.0 landed
-
Transform OR-clauses to SAOP's during index matching
- d4378c0005e6 18.0 landed
-
Fix the value of or_to_any_transform_limit in postgresql.conf.sample
- 2af75e117478 17.0 landed
-
Transform OR clauses to ANY expression
- 72bd38cc99a1 17.0 landed
-
MergeAttributes code deduplication
- 64444ce071f6 17.0 cited
-
SEARCH and CYCLE clauses
- 3696a600e229 14.0 cited
-
Improve estimation of OR clauses using extended statistics.
- 25a9e54d2db3 14.0 cited
-
Teach btree to handle ScalarArrayOpExpr quals natively.
- 9e8da0f75731 9.2.0 cited
-
Revise collation derivation method and expression-tree representation.
- b310b6e31ce5 9.1.0 cited
-
Instead of trying to force WHERE clauses into CNF or DNF normal form,
- 9888192fb773 8.0.0 cited
Attachments
- 0002-Teach-generate_bitmap_or_paths-to-build-BitmapOr-pat-20240213.patch (text/plain) patch 0002
On 12/2/2024 17:51, Alena Rybakina wrote:
> On 12.02.2024 12:01, Andrei Lepikhov wrote:
>> On 12/2/2024 15:55, Alena Rybakina wrote:
>>> As I understand it, match_clauses_to_index is necessary if you have a
>>> RestrictInfo (rinfo1) variable, so maybe we should run it after the
>>> make_restrictonfo procedure, otherwise calling it, I think, is useless.
>> I think you must explain your note in more detail. Before this call,
>> we already called make_restrictinfo() and built rinfo1, haven't we?
>>
> I got it, I think, I was confused by the “else“ block when we can
> process the index, otherwise we move on to the next element.
>
> I think maybe “else“ block of creating restrictinfo with the indexpaths
> list creation should be moved to a separate function or just remove "else"?
IMO, it is a matter of taste. But if you are really confused, maybe it
will make understanding for someone else simpler. So, changed.
> I think we need to check that rinfo->clause is not empty, because if it
> is we can miss calling build_paths_for_OR function. We should add it there:
>
> restriction_is_saop_clause(RestrictInfo *restrictinfo)
> {
> if (IsA(restrictinfo->clause, ScalarArrayOpExpr))
I wonder if we should add here assertion, not NULL check. In what case
we could get NULL clause here? But added for surety.
> By the way, I think we need to add a check that the clauseset is not
> empty (if (!clauseset.nonempty)) otherwise we could get an error. The
> same check I noticed in build_paths_for_OR function.
I don't. Feel free to provide counterexample.
--
regards,
Andrei Lepikhov
Postgres Professional