Re: Declarative partitioning grammar

Hi,



On Jan 12, 2008 6:29 AM, Gavin Sherry <swm@alcove.com.au> wrote:

>
>
> The syntax is half the problem, performance is the other. I will bring
> the performance issues up in another thread. Yes, we are confident that
> we can address the performance issues that rule out the existing
> partitioning for many applications. We need it for our own stuff! :P
>


Agreed, syntax is just the sugar.
Also other than performance, how are updates involving partition keys
causing the resultant tuple to end up in a new partition handled here?

Regards,
Nikhils
-- 
EnterpriseDB               http://www.enterprisedb.com