Re: WaitEventSet resource leakage
Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>
From: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org, Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com>
Date: 2023-11-16T10:21:49Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Attachments
- v1-0001-Use-ResourceOwner-to-track-WaitEventSets.patch (text/x-patch) patch v1-0001
On 16/11/2023 01:08, Tom Lane wrote: > Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi> writes: >> On 09/03/2023 20:51, Tom Lane wrote: >>> After further thought that seems like a pretty ad-hoc solution. >>> We probably can do no better in the back branches, but shouldn't >>> we start treating WaitEventSets as ResourceOwner-managed resources? >>> Otherwise, transient WaitEventSets are going to be a permanent >>> source of headaches. > >> Let's change it so that it's always allocated in TopMemoryContext, but >> pass a ResourceOwner instead: >> WaitEventSet * >> CreateWaitEventSet(ResourceOwner owner, int nevents) >> And use owner == NULL to mean session lifetime. > > WFM. (I didn't study your back-branch patch.) And here is a patch to implement that on master. -- Heikki Linnakangas Neon (https://neon.tech)
Commits
-
Fix resource leak when a FDW's ForeignAsyncRequest function fails
- 555276f85940 14.11 landed
- 481d7d1c01c6 15.6 landed
- 501cfd07dac6 16.2 landed
-
Use ResourceOwner to track WaitEventSets.
- 50c67c2019ab 17.0 landed