Re: Add recovery to pg_control and remove backup_label

David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>

From: David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>
To: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>, vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
Date: 2024-01-28T23:28:41Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 1/28/24 19:11, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 06:27:30PM +0530, vignesh C wrote:
>> Please post an updated version for the same.
>>
>> [1] - http://cfbot.cputube.org/patch_46_3511.log
> 
> With the recent introduction of incremental backups that depend on
> backup_label and the rather negative feedback received, I think that
> it would be better to return this entry as RwF for now.  What do you
> think?

I've been thinking it makes little sense to update the patch. It would 
be a lot of work with all the new changes for incremental backup and 
since Andres and Robert appear to be very against the idea, I doubt it 
would be worth the effort.

I have withdrawn the patch.

Regards,
-David



Commits

  1. Doc: improve documentation for jsonpath behavior.

  2. Extend sendFileWithContent() to handle custom content length in basebackup.c