Re: Add recovery to pg_control and remove backup_label
David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>
From: David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>
To: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>, vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>,
Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>,
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
Date: 2024-01-28T23:28:41Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 1/28/24 19:11, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 06:27:30PM +0530, vignesh C wrote: >> Please post an updated version for the same. >> >> [1] - http://cfbot.cputube.org/patch_46_3511.log > > With the recent introduction of incremental backups that depend on > backup_label and the rather negative feedback received, I think that > it would be better to return this entry as RwF for now. What do you > think? I've been thinking it makes little sense to update the patch. It would be a lot of work with all the new changes for incremental backup and since Andres and Robert appear to be very against the idea, I doubt it would be worth the effort. I have withdrawn the patch. Regards, -David
Commits
-
Doc: improve documentation for jsonpath behavior.
- 7014c9a4bba2 17.0 cited
-
Extend sendFileWithContent() to handle custom content length in basebackup.c
- 7606175991f8 17.0 landed