Horton

Re: Parallel CREATE INDEX for BRIN indexes

Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com>
To: Alexander LAW <1@1o.ru>, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Cc: Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2024-04-17T16:37:07Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
On 4/15/24 20:35, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> ...
>
> Attached is the cleanup I thought about doing earlier in this patch [1]
> to make the code more like btree. The diff might make it seem like a big
> change, but it really just moves the merge code into a separate function
> and makes it use using the conditional variable. I still believe the old
> code is correct, but this seems like an improvement so plan to push this
> soon and resolve the open item.
>

I've now pushed this cleanup patch, after rewording the commit message a
little bit, etc. I believe this resolves the open item tracking this, so
I've moved it to the "resolved" part.


regards

-- 
Tomas Vondra
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Commits

  1. Remove incidental md5() function use from test

  2. Cleanup parallel BRIN index build code

  3. Stabilize test of BRIN parallel create

  4. Revert "Stabilize test of BRIN parallel create"

  5. Add regression test for BRIN parallel builds

  6. Use the correct PG_DETOAST_DATUM macro in BRIN

  7. Update nbits_set in brin_bloom_union

  8. Fix parallel BRIN builds with synchronized scans

  9. Allow parallel CREATE INDEX for BRIN indexes

  10. Add empty BRIN ranges during CREATE INDEX