Re: Bug in ExecModifyTable function and trigger issues for foreign tables
Etsuro Fujita <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>
From: Etsuro Fujita <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>
To: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>
Cc: Ildus Kurbangaliev <i.kurbangaliev@postgrespro.ru>,
Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>,
PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>,
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Date: 2017-06-30T09:44:02Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 2017/06/16 21:29, Etsuro Fujita wrote: > On 2017/06/16 19:26, Ashutosh Bapat wrote: >> That issue has not been addressed. The reason stated was that it would >> make code complicated. But I have not had chance to look at how >> complicated would be and assess myself whether that's worth the >> trouble. > I have to admit that what I proposed upthread is a quick-and-dirty > kluge. One thing I thought to address your concern was to move > rewriteTargetListUD entirely from the rewriter to the planner when doing > inherited UPDATE/DELETE, but I'm not sure that's a good idea, because at > least I think that would need a lot more changes to the rewriter. I'll have second thought about this, so I'll mark this as waiting on author. Best regards, Etsuro Fujita
Commits
-
Fix creation of resjunk tlist entries for inherited mixed UPDATE/DELETE.
- 39f180fdd1e6 9.5.11 landed
- 06ba5309682e 9.6.7 landed
- a57aa430b613 10.2 landed
- 9a785ad57317 11.0 landed