Re: missing documentation for streaming in-progress transactions
Euler Taveira <euler@eulerto.com>
From: "Euler Taveira" <euler@eulerto.com>
To: "Ajin Cherian" <itsajin@gmail.com>, "Peter Smith" <smithpb2250@gmail.com>
Cc: "Amit Kapila" <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>,
pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>,
"Dilip Kumar" <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>
Date: 2021-04-09T00:23:02Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Apr 8, 2021, at 4:25 AM, Ajin Cherian wrote: > Updated. - Protocol version. Currently only version <literal>1</literal> is - supported. - </para> + Protocol version. Currently versions <literal>1</literal> and + <literal>2</literal> are supported. The version <literal>2</literal> + is supported only for server versions 14 and above, and is used to allow + streaming of large in-progress transactions. + </para> s/server versions/server version/ I suggest that the last part of the sentence might be "and it allows streaming of large in-progress transactions" + Since: 2 +</para> +<para> I didn't like this style because it is not descriptive enough. It is also not a style adopted by Postgres. I suggest to add something like "This field was introduced in version 2" or "This field is available since version 2" after the field description. + Xid of the sub-transaction (will be same as xid of the transaction for top-level + transactions). +</para> Although, sub-transaction is also used in the documentation, I suggest to use subtransaction. Maybe change the other sub-transaction occurrences too. -- Euler Taveira EDB https://www.enterprisedb.com/
Commits
-
doc: Update information of new messages for logical replication.
- 15c1a9d9cb76 14.0 landed