Re: Simplify COMMENT and SECURITY LABEL documentation
Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>
From: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: pgsql-docs <pgsql-docs@postgresql.org>
Date: 2021-06-02T15:05:10Z
Lists: pgsql-docs
On 01.06.21 17:56, Alvaro Herrera wrote: >> +1 for the concept, but I feel that "live in" is a bit too informal >> for this context. I'm too caffeine-deprived to instantly come up >> with le mot juste; but perhaps "exist within" would be an improvement? > > The glossary uses "reside in". I like that. > I suppose that we should either use the same term that the glossary > uses, or alternatively fix the glossary to use whatever term we decide > to use here. > > I do notice now that I used the term "belong to" elsewhere in the > glossary. That could use some cleanup. I think "belong to" is a stronger relationship, like a column belongs to a table. Kind of like DEPENDENCY_INTERNAL vs. DEPENDENCY_NORMAL.
Commits
-
doc: Simplify COMMENT and SECURITY LABEL documentation
- 5c25fd650a77 14.0 landed
-
doc: Make terminology in glossary consistent
- 01ddd2f7e411 14.0 landed