Re: [PATCH] Proposal for HIDDEN/INVISIBLE column

Le 18/10/2021 à 17:24, Vik Fearing a écrit :
> On 10/18/21 8:44 AM, Gilles Darold wrote:
>> Le 17/10/2021 à 23:48, Isaac Morland a écrit :
>>> On Sun, 17 Oct 2021 at 17:42, Gilles Darold <gilles@migops.com
>>> <mailto:gilles@migops.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Note that psql doesn't display a separate line for each row in this
>>> case, but the actual result coming back from the server does contain
>>> the appropriate number of rows. 
>> I was not aware of that. In this case perhaps that we can remove the
>> restriction on having at least on expandable column and we will have the
>> same behavior but I can't think of an interest to allow that.
> Allowing no-column tables removed the need to handle a bunch of corner
> cases.  Useful for users or not, the precedent is set.


I agree, now that I know that this is perfectly possible to return N
rows without any data/column I also think that we should allow it in
respect to PostgreSQL behavior with a table with no column. I will
remove the check at SET UNEXPANDED.

-- 
Gilles Darold