Re: WIP Incremental JSON Parser
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
To: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Jacob Champion <jacob.champion@enterprisedb.com>,
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>,
Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres@jeltef.nl>,
Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>,
PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2024-04-24T12:35:37Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 2024-04-24 We 04:56, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 02:04:40PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote: >> Yeah, I think this patch invented a new solution to a problem that >> we've solved in a different way everywhere else. I think we should >> change it to match what we do in general. > As of ba3e6e2bca97, did you notice that test_json_parser_perf > generates two core files because progname is not set, failing an > assertion when using the frontend logging? No, it didn't for me. Thanks for noticing, I've pushed a fix. cheers andrew -- Andrew Dunstan EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
Commits
-
Post review fixes for test_json_parser test module
- ba3e6e2bca97 17.0 landed
-
Shrink test file for test_json_parser module
- b8a7bfa33324 17.0 landed
-
Add support for incrementally parsing backup manifests
- ea7b4e9a2a7c 17.0 landed
-
Introduce a non-recursive JSON parser
- 3311ea86edc7 17.0 landed
-
Use incremental parsing of backup manifests.
- 222e11a10ae9 17.0 landed