Re: Hack around lack of CORRESPONDING BY in EXCEPT?
Manfred Koizar <mkoi-pg@aon.at>
From: Manfred Koizar <mkoi-pg@aon.at>
To: "Lucas Adamski" <ladamski@manageww.com>
Cc: "Postgresql Performance Mailing list (E-mail)" <pgsql-performance@postgresql.org>
Date: 2003-05-07T23:54:04Z
Lists: pgsql-performance
On Wed, 7 May 2003 15:49:06 -0700, "Lucas Adamski" <ladamski@manageww.com> wrote: >The problem is that it simply removes all events where type != 10, versus >subtracting all events from subselect of type 10 where data1 and data2 match >those in the main join. Yes, I realized it when I read Stephan's comment immediately after I had sent my mail. Should have read your requirements more thoroughly. Sorry for the noise ... Servus Manfred