Re: Unexpected "shared memory block is still in use"
Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
From: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2019-09-04T11:36:38Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
I agree with this patch and the reasons for it.
A related point, perhaps we should change the key printed into
postmaster.pid to be in hexadecimal format ("0x08x") so that it matches
what ipcs prints.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
Commits
-
Use data directory inode number, not port, to select SysV resource keys.
- 7de19fbc0b1a 13.0 landed
-
Cope with EINVAL and EIDRM shmat() failures in PGSharedMemoryAttach.
- b1cde67a4f94 9.4.23 landed
- a73c8caea46c 9.6.14 landed
- 91a05390c33c 9.5.18 landed
- 803f90ab795b 11.4 landed
- 610747d86e46 12.0 landed
- 3dcf45af560e 10.9 landed
-
Consistently test for in-use shared memory.
- c098509927f9 12.0 cited