Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: Local indexes for partitioned table
Jesper Pedersen <jesper.pedersen@redhat.com>
From: Jesper Pedersen <jesper.pedersen@redhat.com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Cc: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>,
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>,
David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com>,
Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>,
Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>,
Maksim Milyutin <milyutinma@gmail.com>
Date: 2018-01-02T15:47:17Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Hi Alvaro, On 12/29/2017 12:59 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > This seems to work pretty well, much to my surprise. I was a bit scared > of adding a new deptype, but actually the only affected code is > findDependentObjects() and the semantics of the new type is a subset of > the existing DEPTYPE_INTERNAL, so I think it's okay. I need to fill in > its description in docs and comments though -- I left it out because the > real difference between INTERNAL and INTERNAL_AUTO is not something that > is covered by the existing description of INTERNAL, so maybe I'll need > to expand that one. > > This version includes the fixes I posted as "delta" to the problems > Jesper reported, as well as fixes to the ones reported by Amit. It's > looking pretty good to me -- I'm seeing it as a candidate to commit > early in the upcoming commitfest. > indexing.sql contains a \di command which list the owner of the db, so make check-world fails. Best regards, Jesper
Commits
-
Local partitioned indexes
- 8b08f7d4820f 11.0 landed
-
Fix StoreCatalogInheritance1 to use 32bit inhseqno
- 1ef61ddce908 11.0 landed
- 9a215fb4b5ec 9.3.21 landed
- 8a71ee628854 9.6.7 landed
- 61f08c016322 10.2 landed
- 1284d18b5de9 9.4.16 landed
- 0d993709a773 9.5.11 landed
-
Get rid of copy_partition_key
- 8a0596cb656e 11.0 landed
-
Simplify index_[constraint_]create API
- a61f5ab98638 11.0 landed