Re: Not 7.5, but 8.0 ?

Peter Eisentraut wrote:

> As has been said before, many people think that a Windows port is the
> least interesting feature ever to happen to PostgreSQL, so you're going to
> have to come up with better reasons.  Also note that most major number
> changes in the past weren't because the features were cool, but because
> the project has moved to a new phase.  I don't see any such move
> happening.

What happens if Postgres hits 7.9 but still hasn't reached the next 
phase? :)