Re: POC, WIP: OR-clause support for indexes
Alena Rybakina <a.rybakina@postgrespro.ru>
Commits
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Make group_similar_or_args() reorder clause list as little as possible
- 775a06d44c04 18.0 landed
-
Allow usage of match_orclause_to_indexcol() for joins
- 627d63419e22 18.0 landed
-
Skip not SOAP-supported indexes while transforming an OR clause into SAOP
- 5bba0546eecb 18.0 landed
-
Remove the wrong assertion from match_orclause_to_indexcol()
- d4d11940df94 18.0 landed
-
Teach bitmap path generation about transforming OR-clauses to SAOP's
- ae4569161a27 18.0 landed
-
Transform OR-clauses to SAOP's during index matching
- d4378c0005e6 18.0 landed
-
Fix the value of or_to_any_transform_limit in postgresql.conf.sample
- 2af75e117478 17.0 landed
-
Transform OR clauses to ANY expression
- 72bd38cc99a1 17.0 landed
-
MergeAttributes code deduplication
- 64444ce071f6 17.0 cited
-
SEARCH and CYCLE clauses
- 3696a600e229 14.0 cited
-
Improve estimation of OR clauses using extended statistics.
- 25a9e54d2db3 14.0 cited
-
Teach btree to handle ScalarArrayOpExpr quals natively.
- 9e8da0f75731 9.2.0 cited
-
Revise collation derivation method and expression-tree representation.
- b310b6e31ce5 9.1.0 cited
-
Instead of trying to force WHERE clauses into CNF or DNF normal form,
- 9888192fb773 8.0.0 cited
On 23.11.2023 12:23, Andrei Lepikhov wrote: > I think the usage of nodeToString for the generation of clause hash is > too expensive and buggy. > Also, in the code, you didn't resolve hash collisions. So, I've > rewritten the patch a bit (see the attachment). > One more thing: I propose to enable transformation by default at least > for quick detection of possible issues. > This code changes tests in many places. But, as I see it, it mostly > demonstrates the positive effect of the transformation. On 24.11.2023 06:30, Andrei Lepikhov wrote: > On 23/11/2023 16:23, Andrei Lepikhov wrote: >> This code changes tests in many places. But, as I see it, it mostly >> demonstrates the positive effect of the transformation. > > I found out that the postgres_fdw tests were impacted by the feature. > Fix it, because the patch is on the commitfest and passes buildfarm. > Taking advantage of this, I suppressed the expression evaluation > procedure to make regression test changes more clear. Thank you for your work. You are right, the patch with the current changes looks better and works more correctly. To be honest, I didn't think we could use JumbleExpr in this way. -- Regards, Alena Rybakina Postgres Professional