Re: Allow deleting enumerated values from an existing enumerated data type
Vik Fearing <vik@postgresfriends.org>
From: Vik Fearing <vik@postgresfriends.org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker <ilmari@ilmari.org>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>, Данил Столповских <danil.stolpovskikh@gmail.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, o.tselebrovskiy@postgrespro.ru, d.frolov@postgrespro.ru
Date: 2023-10-03T15:49:22Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 10/3/23 17:44, Tom Lane wrote: > Vik Fearing <vik@postgresfriends.org> writes: >> On 10/2/23 20:07, Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker wrote: >>> FWIW I'm +1 on this patch, > >> Thanks. > >>> and with Tom on dropping the "yet". To me it >>> makes it sound like we intend to implement it soon (fsvo). > >> I am not fundamentally opposed to it, nor to any other wordsmithing the >> committer (probably Tom) wants to do. The main point of the patch is to >> list at least some of the problems that need to be solved in a correct >> implementation. > > Pushed with a bit more work on the text. > > I left out the regression test, as it seems like it'd add test cycles > to little purpose. It won't do anything to improve the odds that > someone finds this text. Thanks! -- Vik Fearing
Commits
-
Add some notes about why "ALTER TYPE enum DROP VALUE" is hard.
- af3ee8a086ca 17.0 landed