Thread
Commits
-
Fix type confusion in AddRelsyncInvalidationMessage
- 99db753c6569 19 (unreleased) landed
-
[PATCH] fix AddRelsyncInvalidationMessage
Stolpovskikh Danil <d.stolpovskikh@ftdata.ru> — 2026-06-11T11:44:32Z
Hi, hackers! I found a small problem in the AddRelsyncInvalidationMessage function of the inval.c module. A year ago, a patch was added that added a new type of message (SHAREDINVALRELSYNC_ID) and filling in messages of this type was not done correctly, the wrong field was used(msg.rc instead msg.rs). Patch attached below. Best regards Danil Stolpovskikh https://ftdata.ru<https://ftdata.ru/> E-mail: d.stolpovskikh@ftdata.ru<mailto:d.stolpovskikh@ftdata.ru> [FTData logo для подписи в письме_250]
-
Re: [PATCH] fix AddRelsyncInvalidationMessage
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> — 2026-06-11T21:18:43Z
On Thu, Jun 11, 2026 at 7:44 AM Stolpovskikh Danil <d.stolpovskikh@ftdata.ru> wrote: > I found a small problem in the AddRelsyncInvalidationMessage function of the inval.c module. > > A year ago, a patch was added that added a new type of message (SHAREDINVALRELSYNC_ID) and filling in messages of this type was not done correctly, the wrong field was used(msg.rc instead msg.rs). I think you're correct, but a similar mistake also occurs just a few lines earlier. I have pushed 99db753c656 to fix both things. -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com