Re: is the base backup protocol used by out-of-core tools?
David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>
From: David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2022-02-08T18:52:32Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 2/8/22 12:39, Robert Haas wrote: > On Tue, Feb 8, 2022 at 1:03 PM Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com> wrote: >> I created this and added that for visibility and so it's not forgotten. >> ISTM that could be done post-freeze, although I don't know if that's useful or >> important. >> >> https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_15_Open_Items > > Thanks. I feel like this is in the department of things that are > unlikely to be an issue for anyone, but could be. But the set of > people who could care is basically just backup tool authors, so > hopefully they'll notice this thread, or that list. I'm aware of several tools that use pg_basebackup but they are using the command-line tool, not the server protocol directly. Personally, I'm in favor of simplifying the code on the server side. If anyone is using the protocol directly (which I kind of doubt) I imagine they would want to take advantage of all the new features that have been added. Regards, -David
Commits
-
Remove server support for the previous base backup protocol.
- 0d4513b61386 15.0 landed
-
Remove server support for old BASE_BACKUP command syntax.
- 9cd28c2e5f11 15.0 landed
-
Modify pg_basebackup to use a new COPY subprotocol for base backups.
- cc333f32336f 15.0 cited
-
Flexible options for BASE_BACKUP.
- 0ba281cb4bf9 15.0 cited