Re: WIP Incremental JSON Parser
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>,
Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres@jeltef.nl>,
Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>,
Jacob Champion <jacob.champion@enterprisedb.com>,
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com>,
PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2024-04-08T22:20:13Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Attachments
- fix-incremental-manifest-parser-memory-leak.patch (text/x-patch) patch
On 2024-04-08 Mo 09:29, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > On 2024-04-07 Su 20:58, Tom Lane wrote: >> Coverity complained that this patch leaks memory: >> >> /srv/coverity/git/pgsql-git/postgresql/src/bin/pg_combinebackup/load_manifest.c: >> 212 in load_backup_manifest() >> 206 bytes_left -= rc; >> 207 json_parse_manifest_incremental_chunk( >> 208 inc_state, buffer, rc, bytes_left == 0); >> 209 } >> 210 >> 211 close(fd); >>>>> CID 1596259: (RESOURCE_LEAK) >>>>> Variable "inc_state" going out of scope leaks the storage it >>>>> points to. >> 212 } >> 213 >> 214 /* All done. */ >> 215 pfree(buffer); >> 216 return result; >> 217 } >> >> /srv/coverity/git/pgsql-git/postgresql/src/bin/pg_verifybackup/pg_verifybackup.c: >> 488 in parse_manifest_file() >> 482 bytes_left -= rc; >> 483 json_parse_manifest_incremental_chunk( >> 484 inc_state, buffer, rc, bytes_left == 0); >> 485 } >> 486 >> 487 close(fd); >>>>> CID 1596257: (RESOURCE_LEAK) >>>>> Variable "inc_state" going out of scope leaks the storage it >>>>> points to. >> 488 } >> 489 >> 490 /* Done with the buffer. */ >> 491 pfree(buffer); >> 492 >> 493 return result; >> >> It's right about that AFAICS, and not only is the "inc_state" itself >> leaked but so is its assorted infrastructure. Perhaps we don't care >> too much about that in the existing applications, but ISTM that >> isn't going to be a tenable assumption across the board. Shouldn't >> there be a "json_parse_manifest_incremental_shutdown()" or the like >> to deallocate all the storage allocated by the parser? > > > > yeah, probably. Will work on it. > > > Here's a patch. In addition to the leaks Coverity found, there was another site in the backend code that should call the shutdown function, and a probably memory leak from a logic bug in the incremental json parser code. All these are fixed. cheers andrew -- Andrew Dunstan EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
Commits
-
Post review fixes for test_json_parser test module
- ba3e6e2bca97 17.0 landed
-
Shrink test file for test_json_parser module
- b8a7bfa33324 17.0 landed
-
Add support for incrementally parsing backup manifests
- ea7b4e9a2a7c 17.0 landed
-
Introduce a non-recursive JSON parser
- 3311ea86edc7 17.0 landed
-
Use incremental parsing of backup manifests.
- 222e11a10ae9 17.0 landed