Re: MERGE PARTITIONS and DEPENDS ON EXTENSION.
Matheus Alcantara <matheusssilv97@gmail.com>
From: Matheus Alcantara <matheusssilv97@gmail.com>
To: Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>,
Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill@gmail.com>
Cc: Dmitry Koval <d.koval@postgrespro.ru>,
pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2026-04-22T11:30:17Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 22/04/26 08:24, Alexander Korotkov wrote: >>> +-- An index created directly on a partition has no parent in the partitioned >>> +-- index tree; merge must ignore such indexes (they disappear with the old >>> +-- partition). >>> +CREATE INDEX part_extdep_3_extra_idx ON part_extdep_3(x); >>> +ALTER TABLE part_extdep MERGE PARTITIONS (part_extdep_merged, part_extdep_3) >>> + INTO part_extdep_merged2; >>> +SELECT relname FROM pg_class >>> +WHERE relname LIKE 'part_extdep_merged2%idx' ORDER BY relname; >> >> Looks like this test is also redundant? This does not test new DEPENDS ON logic. > > I've added the dependency on this index to check index disappears with > its dependency. I think this would make this test more relevant. > > Kirill, Matheus, are you ok with these change? > It works for me. -- Matheus Alcantara EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Preserve extension dependencies on indexes during partition merge/split
- 713e553e3213 19 (unreleased) landed