Re: Lookup tables

Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>

From: Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>
To: Ron Johnson <ronljohnsonjr@gmail.com>, pgsql-general <pgsql-general@postgresql.org>
Date: 2025-02-04T16:06:00Z
Lists: pgsql-general
On 2/4/25 07:19, Ron Johnson wrote:

> How big is the database?  A tiny 500MB db just for you can get by with 
> poor design.  (But then, why are you using PG instead of SQLite?)

For the reasons listed here:

https://sqlite.org/quirks.html

In particular:

[...]

2. SQLite Is Embedded, Not Client-Server

3. Flexible Typing

SQLite is flexible with regard to datatypes. Datatypes are advisory 
rather than mandatory.

4. Foreign Key Enforcement Is Off By Default

[...]

> 
> More importantly, will you ever update the descriptions?  Of course not! 
> Famous last words.  Having a separate PK means that you update one row 
> in one column, while what you've done means that tens/hundreds of 
> thousands of rows in possibly dozens of tables need to be updated.
> 
> It also means that *you* can easily change things in your ad hoc 
> database *without forgetting* to update a table.
> 
> This is called an "update anomaly" in relational design theory.
> 
> -- 
> Death to <Redacted>, and butter sauce.
> Don't boil me, I'm still alive.
> <Redacted> lobster!

-- 
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@aklaver.com