Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign?
Jonathan S. Katz <jkatz@postgresql.org>
From: "Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz@postgresql.org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>,
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>,
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Steven Pousty <steve.pousty@gmail.com>,
Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>,
Isaac Morland <isaac.morland@gmail.com>,
Pierre Giraud <pierre.giraud@dalibo.com>,
PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2020-04-27T13:17:23Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 4/27/20 8:49 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > "Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz@postgresql.org> writes: >> Great. I do want to do a bit more desultory testing in the older >> versions of the docs, but it can be committed whenever the -docs side is >> ready. > > Other than that point, the main.css patch as I presented it just adds > some rules that aren't used yet, so it could be pushed as soon as you're > satisfied about the !important change. It'd probably make sense to > push it in advance of making the markup changes, so we don't have an > interval of near-unreadable devel docs. *nods* I'll ensure to test again and hopefully commit later today. I forget what I was looking at, but I did see a similar pattern in some other modern software docs, so it seems like this is trending in the right direction. Looking forward to the rollout! Jonathan
Commits
-
Doc: re-re-revise markup for tables of functions.
- 4ad047a6eac3 13.0 landed
-
Doc: revise formatting of function/operator tables.
- 737d69ffc3cf 13.0 landed