Re: Online enabling of checksums
Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com>
From: "Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
Cc: Sergei Kornilov <sk@zsrv.org>,
PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>,
Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
Date: 2018-07-31T19:52:40Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 07/31/2018 12:45 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote: > >> Hi!, >> >> Thanks for reviewing, I’ve updated the patch with the above mentioned incorrect >> linkends as well as fixed the comments you made in a previous review. >> >> The CF-builder-bot is red, but it’s because it’s trying to apply the already >> committed patch which is in the attached datallowconn thread. > I think checksumhelper_cost_delay should be checksum_helper_cost_delay. > ^ > > Is "helper" the right word? Based on other terminology within the postgresql.conf should it be "checksum_worker_cost_delay"? JD > -- Command Prompt, Inc. || http://the.postgres.company/ || @cmdpromptinc *** A fault and talent of mine is to tell it exactly how it is. *** PostgreSQL centered full stack support, consulting and development. Advocate: @amplifypostgres || Learn: https://postgresconf.org ***** Unless otherwise stated, opinions are my own. *****
Commits
-
Online enabling and disabling of data checksums
- f19c0eccae96 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Deactive flapping checksum isolation tests.
- bf75fe47e444 11.0 landed
-
Add support for coordinating record typmods among parallel workers.
- cc5f81366c36 11.0 cited