Re: Typed tables
Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>
From: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2009-11-05T21:55:43Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 12:24 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote: > I'm planning to work on typed tables support. The idea is that you > create a table out of a composite type (as opposed to the other way > around, which is currently done automatically). > > CREATE TYPE persons_type AS (name text, bdate date); > > CREATE TABLE persons OF persons_type; > > Or the fancy version: > > CREATE TABLE persons OF persons_type ( PRIMARY KEY (name) ); I use composite types (via tables) all the time but I never use 'create type as'...because by doing so you lose the ability to alter the type with 'alter table'. Am I correct that I could use your idea to make this possible (albeit quite ugly) by: create type foo(a text, b text); create table foo of foo; alter table foo add column c text; drop table foo; -- does this drop the type as well?? merlin