Re: Better shared data structure management and resizable shared data structures
Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>
On 03/04/2026 01:10, Matthias van de Meent wrote:
> While I do think it's an improvement over the current APIs, the
> improvement seems to be mostly concentrated in the RequestStruct/Hash
> department, with only marginal improvements in RegisterShmemCallbacks.
> I feel like it's missing the important part: I'd like
> direct-from-_PG_init() ShmemRequestStruct/Hash calls. If
> ShmemRequestStruct/Hash had a size callback as alternative to the size
> field (which would then be called after preload_libraries finishes)
> then that would be sufficient for most shmem allocations, and it'd
> simplify shmem management for most subsystems.
> We'd still need the shmem lifecycle hooks/RegisterShmemCallbacks to
> allow conditionally allocated shmem areas (e.g. those used in aio),
> but I think that, in general, we shouldn't need a separate callback
> function just to get started registering shmem structures.
I kind of started from that thought too, but the design has since
evolved to what it is. Robert in particular was skeptical of that
approach, and I think I've come around on most of his feedback.
A per-struct size callback isn't very ergonomic in places like
LockManagerShmemRequest(), which derives the size of two different
things from the same calculated value. You'd need to repeat the
calculation for each one, or pass it through global variables or
something. PredicateLockShmemInit() is another extreme example. It
already has that problem to some extent, and already uses global
variables (I'm all ears if you have suggestions to improve it!) but I
feel that with a size callback this kind of stuff would get even harder.
Another reason is that it's good to have only one way of doing the
initialization, instead of one simple way and a different way for more
complex scenarios. If the simple way was vastly simpler, it might be
worth it, but I don't think there's that much difference here.
BTW, I also considered another way of initializing structs for simple
cases: instead of providing an init callback function, you could provide
the struct contents directly in the ShmemRequestStruct() call. To pick a
random example, slotsync.c currently looks like this:
static void
SlotSyncShmemRequest(void *arg)
{
ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Slot Sync Data",
.size = sizeof(SlotSyncCtxStruct),
.ptr = (void **) &SlotSyncCtx,
);
}
static void
SlotSyncShmemInit(void *arg)
{
memset(SlotSyncCtx, 0, sizeof(SlotSyncCtxStruct));
SlotSyncCtx->pid = InvalidPid;
SpinLockInit(&SlotSyncCtx->mutex);
}
But it could look like this instead:
static void
SlotSyncShmemRequest(void *arg)
{
SlotSyncCtxStruct init_content;
memset(SlotSyncCtx, 0, sizeof(SlotSyncCtxStruct));
init_content.pid
SpinLockInit(&SlotSyncCtx->mutex);
ShmemRequestStruct(.name = "Slot Sync Data",
.size = sizeof(SlotSyncCtxStruct),
.ptr = (void **) &SlotSyncCtx,
.init_content = &init_content,
);
}
That'd only work for small, simple structs, though. Since the initial
contents would be copied in this model, it won't work for anything with
pointers to itself, for example. And it's not much less code after all.
- Heikki
Commits
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Tidy up #ifdef USE_INJECTION_POINTS guards
- 9480c585df6c 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Convert all remaining subsystems to use the new shmem allocation API
- 9b5acad3f40f 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Convert buffer manager to use the new shmem allocation functions
- a4b6139dcceb 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Add alignment option to ShmemRequestStruct()
- dacfe81a0de5 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Convert AIO to use the new shmem allocation functions
- 58a1573385ed 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Convert SLRUs to use the new shmem allocation functions
- 2e0943a8597e 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Refactor shmem initialization code in predicate.c
- 4c9eca5afea0 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Use the new shmem allocation functions in a few core subsystems
- c6d55714ba4c 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Convert lwlock.c to use the new shmem allocation functions
- a006bc7b1699 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Introduce a registry of built-in shmem subsystems
- 1fc2e9fbc0a3 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Convert pg_stat_statements to use the new shmem allocation functions
- d4885af3d653 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Add a test module to test after-startup shmem allocations
- 6409994c7dd8 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Introduce a new mechanism for registering shared memory areas
- 283e823f9dcb 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Move some code from shmem.c and shmem.h
- 6ef9bee29310 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Improve test_lwlock_tranches
- 92a685e4070d 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Test pg_stat_statements across crash restart
- 148fe2b05df5 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Refactor PredicateLockShmemInit to not reuse var for different things
- 3fd057772827 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Refactor ShmemIndex initialization
- 6b8238cb6aa7 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Add a new shmem_request_hook hook.
- 4f2400cb3f10 15.0 cited