Re: Disallow USING clause when altering type of generated column
Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>
From: Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>
To: Yugo NAGATA <nagata@sraoss.co.jp>
Cc: jian he <jian.universality@gmail.com>,
pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2024-08-22T08:49:22Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 22.08.24 09:59, Yugo NAGATA wrote:
>>> Although ERRCODE_INVALID_TABLE_DEFINITION is used for en error on changing
>>> type of inherited column, I guess that is because it prevents from breaking
>>> consistency between inherited and inheriting tables as a result of the command.
>>> In this sense, maybe, ERRCODE_INVALID_COLUMN_DEFINITION is proper here, because
>>> this check is to prevent inconsistency between columns in a tuple.
>>
>> Yes, that was my thinking. I think of ERRCODE_FEATURE_NOT_SUPPORTED as
>> "we could add it in the future", but that does not seem to apply here.
>
> + (errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_TABLE_DEFINITION),
> + errmsg("cannot specify USING when altering type of generated column"),
> + errdetail("Column \"%s\" is a generated column.", colName)));
>
> Do you thnik ERRCODE_INVALID_TABLE_DEFINITION is more proper than
> ERRCODE_INVALID_COLUMN_DEFINITION in this case?
COLUMN seems better here.
I copied TABLE from the "cannot alter system column" above, but maybe
that is a different situation.
Commits
-
Disallow USING clause when altering type of generated column
- 4d68a043245a 18.0 landed
- 1c57ae795b3c 12.21 landed
- 7589d5c5b98d 13.17 landed
- ecd19a3cc187 14.14 landed
- cf49a606c416 15.9 landed
- 5867ee0056a2 16.5 landed
- fdbf7e46a46d 17.0 landed