Thread
-
Re: POC: make mxidoff 64 bits
Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi> — 2025-12-10T19:19:18Z
On 09/12/2025 14:00, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > 1. Currently, at multixid wraparound, MultiXactState->nextMXact goes to > 0, which is invalid. All the readers must be prepared for that, and skip > over the 0. That's error-prone, we've already missed that a few times. > Let's change things so that the code that *writes* MultiXactState- > >nextMXact skips over the zero already. Here's a patch for that. Does anyone see a problem with this? - Heikki