Re: Would PostgreSQL 16 native transparent data encryption support database level encryption?

On 5/18/23 14:07, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> On Thu, 18 May 2023, Ron wrote:
>
>>> Why not using multiple clusters then?
>> Yet More Firewall Rules to get approved by the Security Team.  And then they
>> balk at port 5433 because they've never heard of it.
> But mixing multiple customers on one cluster is much more of a risk.

Better have your roles and pg_hba.conf entries defined correctly!

Fortunately, pg_hba.conf is pretty easy.

>> And from a technical point of view, one Postgresql system can better manage the
>> memory on a VM than two which don't know about each other.
> Probably true. Is there something with which multiple clusters running
> on the same server can communicate to do that better?

A /meta/ postmaster!!!

-- 
Born in Arizona, moved to Babylonia.