Re: BUG #18407: ALTER TABLE SET SCHEMA on foreign table with SERIAL column does not move sequence to new schema
Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>
From: Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, vidushi2504@gmail.com
Cc: pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2024-03-26T05:59:30Z
Lists: pgsql-bugs
On 25.03.24 17:17, Tom Lane wrote:
> PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org> writes:
>> I created a foreign table with a serial column and then moved the table to a
>> different schema. The sequence bound to the table column wasn't moved to the
>> new schema. I expected the sequence to be moved as well just like it works
>> for regular tables.
>
> Hmm ... that does seem fairly inconsistent. It looks like the cause
> is in AlterTableNamespaceInternal:
>
> /* Fix other dependent stuff */
> if (rel->rd_rel->relkind == RELKIND_RELATION ||
> rel->rd_rel->relkind == RELKIND_MATVIEW ||
> rel->rd_rel->relkind == RELKIND_PARTITIONED_TABLE)
> {
> AlterIndexNamespaces(classRel, rel, oldNspOid, nspOid, objsMoved);
> AlterSeqNamespaces(classRel, rel, oldNspOid, nspOid,
> objsMoved, AccessExclusiveLock);
> AlterConstraintNamespaces(RelationGetRelid(rel), oldNspOid, nspOid,
> false, objsMoved);
> }
>
> It's probably reasonable to have this relkind gating for
> AlterIndexNamespaces, although I'm not sure it saves much to
> skip that, either. But we can have sequences attached to
> foreign tables, and I think maybe constraints as well.
> Maybe it'd be best to just drop this relkind check altogether?
Yes, seems better to remove the relkind check.
Commits
-
Fix failure of ALTER FOREIGN TABLE SET SCHEMA to move sequences.
- fad3b5b5acb1 17.0 landed
- b48eda4e5481 15.7 landed
- a8b7408686a5 12.19 landed
- 97de2a15992f 13.15 landed
- 7445f092814d 16.3 landed
- 66bbad581ce2 14.12 landed