Re: Retiring some encodings?
Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>
From: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>
To: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Cc: Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2025-05-23T07:18:34Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 23/05/2025 05:11, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Thu, May 22, 2025 at 10:02:16AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: >> Agreed on notification. A radical idea would be to add a warning for >> the use of such encodings in PG 18, and then mention their deprecation >> in the PG 18 release notes so everyone is informed they will be removed >> in PG 19. > > With v18beta1 already out in the wild, I think that we are too late > for taking any action on this version at this stage. Putting a > deprecation notice for a selected set of conversions and/or encodings > and do the actual removal work when v20 opens up around July 2026 > would sound like a better timing here, if the overall consensus goes > in this direction, of course. If we plan to remove something in the future, I think putting a deprecation notice in the docs in v18 is still a good idea. There's no point in hiding the plan by not documenting it sooner. The more advance notice people get the better. -- Heikki Linnakangas Neon (https://neon.tech)