Re: POC, WIP: OR-clause support for indexes
Alena Rybakina <lena.ribackina@yandex.ru>
Commits
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Make group_similar_or_args() reorder clause list as little as possible
- 775a06d44c04 18.0 landed
-
Allow usage of match_orclause_to_indexcol() for joins
- 627d63419e22 18.0 landed
-
Skip not SOAP-supported indexes while transforming an OR clause into SAOP
- 5bba0546eecb 18.0 landed
-
Remove the wrong assertion from match_orclause_to_indexcol()
- d4d11940df94 18.0 landed
-
Teach bitmap path generation about transforming OR-clauses to SAOP's
- ae4569161a27 18.0 landed
-
Transform OR-clauses to SAOP's during index matching
- d4378c0005e6 18.0 landed
-
Fix the value of or_to_any_transform_limit in postgresql.conf.sample
- 2af75e117478 17.0 landed
-
Transform OR clauses to ANY expression
- 72bd38cc99a1 17.0 landed
-
MergeAttributes code deduplication
- 64444ce071f6 17.0 cited
-
SEARCH and CYCLE clauses
- 3696a600e229 14.0 cited
-
Improve estimation of OR clauses using extended statistics.
- 25a9e54d2db3 14.0 cited
-
Teach btree to handle ScalarArrayOpExpr quals natively.
- 9e8da0f75731 9.2.0 cited
-
Revise collation derivation method and expression-tree representation.
- b310b6e31ce5 9.1.0 cited
-
Instead of trying to force WHERE clauses into CNF or DNF normal form,
- 9888192fb773 8.0.0 cited
Attachments
- graphs.html (text/html)
- graphs.png (image/png)
On 27.06.2023 16:19, Alena Rybakina wrote: > Thank you for your feedback, your work is also very interesting and > important, and I will be happy to review it. I learned something new > from your letter, thank you very much for that! > > I analyzed the buffer consumption when I ran control regression tests > using my patch. diff shows me that there is no difference between the > number of buffer block scans without and using my patch, as far as I > have seen. (regression.diffs) > > > In addition, I analyzed the scheduling and duration of the execution > time of the source code and with my applied patch. I generated 20 > billion data from pgbench and plotted the scheduling and execution > time depending on the number of "or" expressions. > By runtime, I noticed a clear acceleration for queries when using the > index, but I can't say the same when the index is disabled. > At first I turned it off in this way: > 1)enable_seqscan='off' > 2)enable_indexonlyscan='off' > enable_indexscan='off' > > Unfortunately, it is not yet clear which constant needs to be set when > the transformation needs to be done, I will still study in detail. > (the graph for all this is presented in graph1.svg) > \\ > -- > Regards, > Alena Rybakina Sorry, just now I noticed that there were incorrect names in the headings of the pictures, I corrected it. I also attach its html copy, because it may be more convenient for viewing it. -- Regards, Alena Rybakina