Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory
Josh <josh@globalherald.net>
From: Joshua Kramer <josh@globalherald.net>
To: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy@postgresql.org>
Date: 2011-05-03T18:28:27Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
> Part of the problem is the name we're using for the feature. "Unlogged > tables" sounds like we've taken something away and are calling that a > feature. "Now with no brakes!" As feature names go, it's as unsexy as Logless tables? Log-Free tables?