Thread

Commits

  1. Fix inconsistent markups in catalogs.sgml

  1. tag typos in "catalog.sgml"

    Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr> — 2020-06-21T07:10:35Z

    Hello,
    
    While reviewing a documentation patch, I noticed that a few tags where 
    wrong in "catalog.sgml". Attached patch fixes them.
    
    -- 
    Fabien.
  2. Re: tag typos in "catalog.sgml"

    Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> — 2020-06-21T10:31:16Z

    On Sun, Jun 21, 2020 at 09:10:35AM +0200, Fabien COELHO wrote:
    > While reviewing a documentation patch, I noticed that a few tags where wrong
    > in "catalog.sgml". Attached patch fixes them.
    
    Good catches, thanks Fabien.  I will fix that tomorrow or so.
    --
    Michael
    
  3. Re: tag typos in "catalog.sgml"

    Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> — 2020-06-22T04:48:11Z

    On Sun, Jun 21, 2020 at 07:31:16PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
    > Good catches, thanks Fabien.  I will fix that tomorrow or so.
    
    And applied to HEAD.
    --
    Michael
    
  4. Re: tag typos in "catalog.sgml"

    Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr> — 2020-06-22T19:09:28Z

    >> Good catches, thanks Fabien.  I will fix that tomorrow or so.
    >
    > And applied to HEAD.
    
    Ok.
    
    Should it be backpatched? I'm not sure what the usual practice is wrt to 
    small fixes in the doc.
    
    -- 
    Fabien.
    
    
    
    
  5. Re: tag typos in "catalog.sgml"

    Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> — 2020-06-23T01:03:20Z

    On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 09:09:28PM +0200, Fabien COELHO wrote:
    > Should it be backpatched? I'm not sure what the usual practice is wrt to
    > small fixes in the doc.
    
    The text is right, and this impacts only the appearance of the text,
    so I did not see that this was enough for a backpatch.
    --
    Michael
    
  6. Re: tag typos in "catalog.sgml"

    Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr> — 2020-06-23T04:32:53Z

    Bonjour Michaël,
    
    >> Should it be backpatched? I'm not sure what the usual practice is wrt to
    >> small fixes in the doc.
    >
    > The text is right, and this impacts only the appearance of the text,
    > so I did not see that this was enough for a backpatch.
    
    Ok. It would mean that possible other doc patches on the same area would 
    not backpatch easily, but the doc is expected to be more or less frozen 
    for a given version. So fine with me.
    
    -- 
    Fabien.