Re: psql - add SHOW_ALL_RESULTS option
Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr>
From: Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>,
vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>,
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>,
Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>, daniel@manitou-mail.org,
peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com, iwata.aya@jp.fujitsu.com,
PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2020-01-16T21:33:48Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Hello Tom, >> This is one of the patches already marked as RFC (since September by >> Alvaro). Anyone interested in actually pushing it, so that it does not >> fall through to yet another commitfest? > > TBH, I think we'd be better off to reject it. This makes a nontrivial > change in a very long-standing psql behavior, with AFAICS no way to > get back the old semantics. (The thread title is completely misleading > about that; there's no "option" in the patch as it stands.) The thread title was not misleading, the initial version of the patch did offer an option. Then I was said "the current behavior is stupid (which I agree), let us change it to the sane behavior without option", then I'm told the contrary. Sigh. I still have the patch with the option, though. > Sure, in a green field this behavior would likely be more sensible ... > but that has to be weighed against the fact that it's behaved the way it > does for a long time, and any existing scripts that are affected by that > behavior have presumably deliberately chosen to use it. I cannot imagine many people actually relying on the current insane behavior. > I can't imagine that changing this will make very many people happier. > It seems much more likely that people who are affected will be unhappy. > > The compatibility issue could be resolved by putting in the option > that I suppose was there at the beginning. Indeed. > But then we'd have to have a debate about which behavior would be > default, The patch was keeping current behavior as the default because people do not like a change whatever. > and there would still be the question of who would find this to > be an improvement. If you're chaining together commands with \; then > it's likely that you are happy with the way it behaves today. > Certainly there's been no drumbeat of bug reports about it. Why would there be bug report if this is a feature? :-) The behavior has been irritating me for a long time. It is plain stupid to be able to send queries but not see their results. -- Fabien.
Commits
-
psql: Show all query results by default
- 7844c9918a43 15.0 landed
- 3a5130672296 14.0 landed
-
psql: Refactor ProcessResult()
- 5519d5affdfa 15.0 landed
-
psql: Refactor SendQuery()
- 8910a25fef3d 15.0 landed
-
psql: Add test for psql behavior on server crash
- 8cd7627c7b19 15.0 landed
-
psql: Additional tests
- 9028cce426ba 15.0 landed
-
Improve some psql test code
- fbee60f6a4ff 15.0 landed
-
psql: Fix some scan-build warnings
- 390edeeb570c 15.0 landed
-
psql: Add test for handling of replication commands
- 67c069848a99 15.0 landed
-
psql: More tests
- c0280bc3edeb 15.0 landed
-
psql: Add various tests
- 14d755b00037 15.0 landed
-
psql: Add test for query canceling
- 5b3f471ff23a 15.0 landed
-
Revert "psql: Show all query results by default"
- fae65629cec8 14.0 landed
-
Extend a test case a little
- b3a9e9897ec7 14.0 landed