Re: [HACKERS] JPA + enum == Exception

Kris Jurka <books@ejurka.com>

From: Kris Jurka <books@ejurka.com>
To: Tom Dunstan <tom@tomd.cc>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>, "Hudson, Derrick" <dhudson@redcom.com>, "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>, "pgsql-jdbc@postgresql.org" <pgsql-jdbc@postgresql.org>
Date: 2013-02-08T16:26:27Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, 8 Feb 2013, Tom Dunstan wrote:

> On 8 February 2013 15:25, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> 
> > AFAIK this is just business as usual with JDBC: setString() implies that
> > the parameter is of a string type.  It'll fall over if the type actually
> > required is anything but a string.  (I'm no Java expert, but I seem to
> > recall that using setObject instead is the standard workaround.)
> >
> 
> Yes, you can use setObject(1, "enumval", Types.OTHER). I was hoping
> that setString might work, as mapping java enum values to strings in
> the database is a very common ORM technique that is built into
> basically all major ORMs including all that support the JPA standard,
> and it leads to people using varchars instead of typesafe enums in
> their dbs.

The other workaround is to use the url parameter stringtype=unspecified to 
have setString always bind to unknown instead of varchar, which then 
shouldn't require any code changes.

Kris Jurka