Thread

  1. Re: PG 9.0 release timetable

    Marc G. Fournier <scrappy@hub.org> — 2010-05-31T15:34:21Z

    On Mon, 31 May 2010, Bruce Momjian wrote:
    
    > Marc G. Fournier wrote:
    >> On Mon, 31 May 2010, Tom Lane wrote:
    >>
    >>> I find myself entirely unimpressed by proposals to make releases
    >>> according to some rigid schedule that takes no account of whether
    >>> packaging manpower is actually available.
    >>
    >> How many beta testers out there *rely* on a package to do their testing?
    >> I'm not saying don't try and get packages in place, I'm just saying it
    >> shouldn't be a requirement to stamp code BETA and create a tar ball ...
    >
    > Well, they can just grab nightly snapshots and test, right?  I don't
    > think a beta is fundamentally different from a nightly snapshot,
    > source-code wise.
    
    doesn't really give a good reference point for testing purposes ... if 
    everyone downloads BETA2 and tests, they are all testing the exact same 
    code ...
    
    ----
    Marc G. Fournier                        Hub.Org Hosting Solutions S.A.
    scrappy@hub.org                                     http://www.hub.org
    
    Yahoo:yscrappy    Skype: hub.org    ICQ:7615664    MSN:scrappy@hub.org