Re: List traffic

On Fri, 14 May 2010, Yeb Havinga wrote:

> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>> On Thu, 13 May 2010, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> 
>>> Excerpts from Yeb Havinga's message of jue may 13 15:06:53 -0400 2010:
>>> 
>>>> My $0.02 - I like the whole 'don't sort, search' (or how did they call
>>>> it?) just let the inbox fill up, google is fast enough. What would be
>>>> really interesting is to have some extra 'tags/headers' added to the
>>>> emails (document classification with e.g. self organizing map/kohonen),
>>>> so my local filters could make labels based on that, instead of perhaps
>>>> badly spelled keywords in subjects or message body.
>> 
>> I missed this when I read it the first time .. all list email does have an 
>> X-Mailing-List header added so that you can label based on list itself ... 
>> is that what you mean, or are you thinking of something else entirely?
> Something else: if automatic classification of articles was in place, there 
> would be need of fewer mailing lists, depending on the quality of the 
> classification.

You've mentinoed this serveral time, but what *is* "autoclassication 
of articles"?  or is this something you do on the gmail side of things?


----
Marc G. Fournier                        Hub.Org Hosting Solutions S.A.
scrappy@hub.org                                     http://www.hub.org

Yahoo:yscrappy    Skype: hub.org    ICQ:7615664    MSN:scrappy@hub.org